This is a free country, a constitutional democratic republic bound by the rule of law, with a written constitution to protect rights and enforce duties.
When I was a kid and this was a free country, we elected those who make our laws, and lawmakers were accountable to the people. They would not, they could not have enacted and enforced such laws of totalitarianism as you describe.
Not here!
No, nay, never!
Not when I was a kid and this was a free country.
But now I'm not a kid, and since 2020 I do not recognize my country, except by comparison to Russia in 1917, to Weimar Germany in 1935 to China in 1955 and, most frightening, to Canada and Australia in 2022, both of which were culturally and legally very much like the USA and both of which were free countries until 2020, but both of which in 2022 are no longer free countries.
Canada and Australia (and N.Z.) have never been free countries, but under ultimate control of The Crown. They are still colonies of the British Empire as far as the Royals are concerned, from what I have heard.
Yep. Canada has a very misleading system that makes its citizens think they are free and independent but in reality the are under the control of the Queen or King of England.
What do you mean by "been allowed to go the way of former Eastern European nations?" I assume you mean former Soviet Block nations. Korea has nothing to do with them, except for their somewhat parallel situation as a vassal State of a Communist regime. The USSR "broke up", but obviously China's influence and imperialism is only growing.
North Korea is NOT our future. If the CCP gets its way, they will complete their takover of America through the methods of "Unrestricted Warfare" that they have been for at least twenty years, and are currently, deploying against us with the intention of completely conquering us without needing to go kinetic. After they accomplish our destruction they intend to invade us with hundreds of thousands, or millions, of soldiers and carry out a "mop up" extermination campaign. They have no need for us Inferiors, and only want our land and resources, especially our agricultural land. The Chinese are allegedly some of the most racist people on Earth, and if you are not Han Chinese, they just want to eliminate you ("useless eaters"). They certainly don't need to add more bodies to their slave population. They are very accomplished at putting bullets into the back of people's heads!
Cousin Teddy could walk and talk, so he was always on the move and he seldom shut up.
FDR could not walk but he could talk and he seldom shut up when it came to pompous remarks about political opponents and his UN illusions or ceding territory to Stalin. But FDR was mute around Vice President Truman, so that president Truman was dangerously in the dark about national security when FDR finally stopped talking, forever.
Dear people. Trans comes from latin and means 'over' or 'across' or 'beyond'. Like in Transatlantic, for instance. So what I meant with Transcommunist is just that: beyond communist as we know it. Or communism 2.0 as you wish. Thanks for reading me. I'm writing a new piece as we speak, so keep following!
Alain - you have to keep in mind the current social conversation, what people are saying, so when you write something like this you know to be explicit (not implicit) about what you mean by trans. Right now when the term Trans comes up in anything the first thought is transgender. Like many I assumed that's was what you were going to write about based on your title. This is not a criticism of your piece which I liked just a comment.
Bringing attention to this issue through articles like this help build awareness. However, unless they include links to options and empowering steps people can take to maintain their autonomy, and to block these plans, the articles only add to the fear porn.
There are always solutions. History shows people always rise up and overthrow tyranny when they have had enough. That time is already here. We have had enough, and we have pre-emptively had enough of these petty-minded tyrants.
Go to Global Walkout for some steps to get started.
Form local groups to barter, to support local growers, craftspeople and trades people.
Use cash, cash, cash.
Refuse to use self-serve checkouts, and generally avoid any business that is part of multi-nationals or is not interested in building win-win relationships with their clients.
Collect articles and data on cyber hacks and send these to your elected officials, stating you require them - as your representative - to uphold privacy laws, and to refuse the introduction of digital ID, and central digital currency.
Don't just send to them once - send to them often - phone them - post documents to them - and even organise email/letter/phone campaigns - to alert these public servants that the will of the people is to remain free and independent of govt enslavement.
Get pro-active about alerting people and building support to get govts to withdraw from WEF, UN, and any organisation or treaty that is calling the shots (pun) from the top - overruling democracy by lobbing govts to do their bidding.
These are just a few effective steps you can take.
The people have the true power, they just don't realise it. The govts - so obviously corrupt and colluding with each other AGAINST the people - want to keep us frightened, ignorant and battling each other - while they continue to strip us of sovereign rights that are NOT theirs to take.
"I do not consent" is one of the most powerful things you can think and say.
Get informed about your rights and how to protect them. Form study groups to help each other build knowledge and networks, and confidence with how to interact with officials who are breaching laws and rights. There are lawyers and human rights experts who can mentor you.
In Australia, we are starting to form People's Councils, throughout local regions. Once these are properly in place, we will formally overrule the current city councils, oust them from their offices, and take over running of the communities at ground level. This is happening. There are solutions.
Get clear.
Get connected.
Stay strong.
Get pro-active.
The most exciting thing about all this is to show each other - we DO value life, despite differences - and we CAN invest in everyone's thriving in ethical ways - without the bureaucrooks stealing our time, money, energy, and values.
Why is this titled "Transcommunism is coming" when there is nothing in teh post about trans communism unless your calling teh World Economic Forums efforts to implement a digital currency in place of existing money is Transcommunism.
I see Transcommunism as teh trans-activist flavor of collectivist governance in which the implementation of a trackable/controllable currency is just 1 piece of a larger system or plan.
Granted, he could have explained this and defined it at the beginning of the article, to provide clarity and avoid any lingering vagueness. But the entire article was about Communism being established through the Government gaining control over every individual's financial transactions; Communism which is activated and put in place by the government establishing Digital Currency, through which every purchase is monitored and approved or disapproved, every transaction monitored and recorded by the Government, and this government monitoring and control leading to a totalitarian dictatorship over every citizens life, and through which the government is notified and triggered to impose punishments and consequences for any disobedience a.k.a "failure to comply", as has already been seen in China, and most recently up in Canada during the Truckers COVID Protests...
It's what the entire article was about...
Transcommunism = Communism powered by the engine of Digital Currency whereby every financial transaction is controlled, monitored, approved or disapproved by an all-seeing, always watching Government that has eliminated all freedom, all personal choice, and assumed control over every aspect of ones life through the monitoring of all financial activity through the vehicle of Digital Currency technology that it has developed and put in place.
You'll notice he also didn't mention how the US Treasury and the Fed are currently making plans to establish Digital Currency here in the US, to totally replace the dollar and eliminate cash, as well, but it's been in the news, and Jerome Powell has been interviewed on 60 minutes admitting that they have been looking into how this can be done since Biden took office.
Biden is a major proponent of the WEF and helping China take control of the US, including putting a social credit scoring (ESG) system in place as a foundational step in accomplishing that, and has personally met with Klaus Schwab asking for his guidance and advice on how to implement the WEF's goals here in the US.
So what I missed is that Trans is transactional and not transgender. I'm so accustom to anything with "trans' in it being about teh transgender movement. Thank you for the clarity.
This is the system that's described in Revelation, where the antichrist makes everyone of every social and economic class get a mark or implantation of some kind in their right hand or forehead, probably above the right eye, in order to participate in the economy. Without this mark, no one can buy or sell anything.
The majority will continue to deny this, call it conspiracy theory, even as they are getting the mark on their hand/forehead. I think some of what will kill this is that it won't be just the Right hand but either hand. Its possible the bible was altered over time or misinterpreted so that once we arrived this point the word of the "Right hand" will be defeat b/c they will do either hand.
Why is this considered a "suspicious link" when forwarded? Not good.
Back to the article. Could Tom Luongo be right, that JP Morgan, Wells, and Goldman will not go along with Davos on this, nor with digitizing the Fed? Could this save us? What would be Trump, or de Santis' positions on this? Shouldn't this be front and center going forward? The "free" vs "security state" freaks. What a battle, huh?
You'll have to ask your antivirus company or email provider for the answer to your first question....
As far as your next question, you'd have to point us to the article by Tom Luongo, otherwise we have no idea what he actually had to say on the subject, aside from what you generally summarized, and so we really couldn't give you an informed answer on that.
As far as Trump's or DeSantis's position on this, we couldn't tell you that either, as so far they haven't seemed to see the need to bring it up as an issue... you'd have to ask them.
Whether it should be front and center isn't really for us to say, as who is it that would be listening to us, exactly...? Probably a better question to ask Congress... providing you've got the time and resources...
No idea what you're referring to as far as "free" vs "security state" freaks either.... this scheme is being promoted by the control hungry globalists led by Klaus Schwab at the World Economic Forum, as the article states... it's about absolute totalitarian control... he wrote a whole book on it... as the article stated... you can find it online for free as a .pdf... it's called "The Great Reset".
...and there's not much of any battle going on, as no parties have been named that are fighting back... it's just a slow, steady progression forward, as those in positions of power and control who are connected with Schwab and the WEF keep making decisions that give them more power and control, and we lowly individuals really don't have any say in the matter at all as individuals who are not in positions of authority or control legislatively or politically....
Not entirely true. not every entity of sizeable power is necessarily "on board" with what Schwab's group is trying to do so much as go along with the over all plan so far because it's profitable. Once we get to those last few steps that will be very obvious as to what they are trying to do I believe we will see some of these entities who are currently cooperation, begin to resist. Why are they going along now but could resist later? Like many they still refuse to believe what Schwab's group wants to do, they think its conspiracy theory non-sense.
No idea what I mentioned that you're attempting to object to, honestly... nothing you've said seems to contradict anything that was stated in the comment above, or makes any kind of refutation against it... as far as what was stated, it seems to stand on it's own just fine...
I find it humorous that here you've said "nothing you've said seems to contradict anything that was stated in the comment above, or makes any kind of refutation against it" and in another go on to try and insult me claiming I need to improve my comprehension skills. So I need to remove the splinter from eye but you should also focus on the 2x4 in yours.
In both cases you seem to have shown reading comprehension problems....
In other words, in both cases, my responses pointed to the same thing, which apparently you still didn't understand....
No idea what you're talking about with splinters and 2x4's, since both responses basisally pointed out the same thing to you, and yet you still don't get it...
If I wanted to insult you, I'd say that was pretty humerous... but we both know it's nothing to be laughed about, but something you certainly have shown you need help with, or to work on if you care to...
So, I'll leave you to it, and wish you success in the future....
No, I listed those who are fighting back and it's hopefully the commercial banks through the Fed. They have the most to loose , and by extension us if we don't pay attention, and if we let goofballs like Biden, Yellen, WEF and Co guide us going forward. It doesn't have to be this way. Who wants to live in a 'Minority Report" world governed by "Eurotrash, commie, faggots"? Not my words, but an interesting term of endearment nonetheless given. The idea of returning to Federalism by regional Fed policy; that along with some long term bond couponed with gold makes a lot of sense and all through this lens of SOFR. Talk about fixing a problem.
But they're not "resisting"... they are going right along with it... In fact, there are articles about this that are readily found, such as "JPMorgan, Goldman face probe by 19 states over ESG investing" from October 2022... they're not resisiting it at all, they're attempting to capitalize on it, and buying into it... they are part of the problem... not any kind of solution to it...
Up to a point maybe. We're talking about the Fed not going along with it, and that includes the commercial banks. If they do what is being suggested, digital currencies, and then only one bank, that means no more commercial banking. Why would they go along with that?
I agree that all of what you said is true and very concerning, however I fail to see how it's helpful or even relevant to use the trans flag to speak out against it. We must all be wary of simply finding another group of people to dehumanize...I know trans individuals who are authentic, freedom-minded, and spiritual, not at all connected to transhumanism. Let's not lose nuance as we build alliances with all who stand for sovereignty.
Did you even read the article...? if you did, you obviously didn't understand it...
This has nothing to do with transsexuals... not one thing.
It has to do with Communism being brought in through Government control over Digital Currency Transactions.... Financial Transaction Communism... shortened to Transaction Communism... hence "Trans-Communism"...
We europeans clearly don't care much about any of the stuff They have been doing since March 2020...
Not even with all these terrorist sanctions against cheap and plentiful Energy do the herds of modern moron slaves in Europe start to see what the END GOAL is.
In the text you write "Covid crisis" it seems obvious you forgot the word "planned"!
"Covid planned crisis"
And those weren't reactions but rather just the field test of the tools/measures they discussed during the previous years and specially during the last coordination meeting held in October 2019.
The WEF is just one gang of scoundrels and terrorists working and obeying the Orders of the Secular Ruling Families & Billionaires (at least those that matter!).
Not only did the article not mention anything about transgenders at all, but the article literally had nothing to do with transgenders even remotely.
The article was about Communism, hence "trans-communism", being brought in through Government control of Digital Financial Transactions. Digital Financial Transaction Communism, also known as Trans-Communism.
So why are so many thinning it's about transgenderism? Because that is what is currently associated wit teh term Trans so if you are going to use Trans and not in teh context of gender ideology then you're wise to explicitly state that at the begging of your piece.
I don't know about "so many" people taking the article out of context and thinking it was about transgenderism somehow, as your's was the only comment I saw that had misunderstood the article at the time I responded.
However, even if there are others who had also missed the context of the article and misunderstnading what it was actually about, that still doesn't change what it's actually about, which is control over people (Communism) being brougt in through our financial transactions with the new Digital Currency that they are trying to put in place. That is explicity what the author stated, and was writing about.
This really shouldn't be that hard to comprehend, especially after it was explained to you.... you should be able to go back over the article and see it with a fresh set of eyes, and a new understanding pretty easily after that, really... regardless of how many others may have misunderstood it, being fixated as they are on anything called "trans" automatically meaning "transgenderism" in their very limited understanding, and personal biases that cause them to have a knee-jerk reaction whenever they hear the term, just as you did, initially....
For them to do this only shows that they are shallow readers, with poor reading comprehension skills, and does not take anything away from what was written, or what was originally intended in the writing itself... it only means they are attempting to read material above their reading skill level.... and that's all it means.
However, the fact is, when one writes to an adult readership, one assumes the readers of the material are savvy enough to realize how a term is used from the context that it is used in, and that they don't need to have things that the vast majority of readers will readily understand explained to them, as if they are remedial readers who don't have the basic understanding that things must always be understood in context....
...and one presumes that the reader won't automatically take one term in isolation, out of context, fixate on that term, and disregard everything else that is being written, which makes no sense in relation to what they have taken that one term to mean (which obviously it won't), and will take the time to consider what they may have missed in their understanding for things to actually make sense... in this case that "trans" didn't refer to "transgenerism" at all, and so it must have been referring to something else... as the author indicated in his article.
One assumes their readers are not at such a poor reading level that without such basic explanations, they will take things out of context, totally misconstrue what was being spoken about, misunderstand the material, and go telling others that something was said or written about that never really was....
If you lack the ability to understand the context of what is being written about in general, that is an individual inadequacy in your reading skills, which others may also share, and it should be recognized as such, especially when someone has taken the time to explain what the actual context of the article was about for your personal benefit...
There is no need for the author to dumb down their writing for individuals who lack the ability to understand context, and as a result take things out of context and get the wrong idea from what is written, when the article is not actually written for that audience to begin with... it was written for those with the ability to understand it at the level it was written at... with the subject being explained, in this case, as being Communism brought in through Digital Financial Transactions...which the author did state, and spent the entire article elucidating on...
You were offered the kindness of having this explained to you... be gracious enough to accept the explanation, and don't carry on with blaming the author for your, or others, sub-standard reading comprehension skill level.... schools apparently don't put a priority on this anymore these days, unfortunately, so it's not surprising you're seeing others misunderstanding as well.... but it still doesn't change what the article was about, or the fact that you didn't pick up on it and needed some assistance in order to understand it and to see where you went' wrong...
Rather than blaming the author, or seeking to justify your original misunderstanding by saying others misunderstood too, so your misunderstanding must be okay, neither of which is an appriopriate response, it would serve you far better for you to learn from what was explained to you, and to take it with you going forward...
See if you can become a little more circumspect, and when something doesn't make sense to you when you're reading, consider that you may have simply misunderstood what was written, read it again to see what it was you might have missed, and accept when someone explains it to you when you can't, and move on...
It is not the authors problem having anything to do with his writing skill level, this is a reader comprehension skill problem, regardless of how many others may have the same low-level of reading comprehension skills these days... and you were provided with the information you were unable to grasp on your own... and that should have been the end of it...
You have an option here - either make it a goal to increase your reading skill level, or stop reading material that is above your level to comprehend.... it's reallly that simple...
No way!
Never!
Not here!
Could not happen here.
This is a free country, a constitutional democratic republic bound by the rule of law, with a written constitution to protect rights and enforce duties.
When I was a kid and this was a free country, we elected those who make our laws, and lawmakers were accountable to the people. They would not, they could not have enacted and enforced such laws of totalitarianism as you describe.
Not here!
No, nay, never!
Not when I was a kid and this was a free country.
But now I'm not a kid, and since 2020 I do not recognize my country, except by comparison to Russia in 1917, to Weimar Germany in 1935 to China in 1955 and, most frightening, to Canada and Australia in 2022, both of which were culturally and legally very much like the USA and both of which were free countries until 2020, but both of which in 2022 are no longer free countries.
Canada and Australia (and N.Z.) have never been free countries, but under ultimate control of The Crown. They are still colonies of the British Empire as far as the Royals are concerned, from what I have heard.
Yep. Canada has a very misleading system that makes its citizens think they are free and independent but in reality the are under the control of the Queen or King of England.
Why do you think North Korea STILL has not been allowed to go the way of former eastern European nations?
Because North Korea is our future!
What do you mean by "been allowed to go the way of former Eastern European nations?" I assume you mean former Soviet Block nations. Korea has nothing to do with them, except for their somewhat parallel situation as a vassal State of a Communist regime. The USSR "broke up", but obviously China's influence and imperialism is only growing.
North Korea is NOT our future. If the CCP gets its way, they will complete their takover of America through the methods of "Unrestricted Warfare" that they have been for at least twenty years, and are currently, deploying against us with the intention of completely conquering us without needing to go kinetic. After they accomplish our destruction they intend to invade us with hundreds of thousands, or millions, of soldiers and carry out a "mop up" extermination campaign. They have no need for us Inferiors, and only want our land and resources, especially our agricultural land. The Chinese are allegedly some of the most racist people on Earth, and if you are not Han Chinese, they just want to eliminate you ("useless eaters"). They certainly don't need to add more bodies to their slave population. They are very accomplished at putting bullets into the back of people's heads!
Thank you! Also - it was Franklin D. Roosevelt who was President in that period, not Theodore his cousin.
Thanks for the heads up! I corrected it.
Oh - my pleasure. Please feel free to delete my original post!
Harmless error. We knew whom he meant.
Cousin Teddy could walk and talk, so he was always on the move and he seldom shut up.
FDR could not walk but he could talk and he seldom shut up when it came to pompous remarks about political opponents and his UN illusions or ceding territory to Stalin. But FDR was mute around Vice President Truman, so that president Truman was dangerously in the dark about national security when FDR finally stopped talking, forever.
Dear people. Trans comes from latin and means 'over' or 'across' or 'beyond'. Like in Transatlantic, for instance. So what I meant with Transcommunist is just that: beyond communist as we know it. Or communism 2.0 as you wish. Thanks for reading me. I'm writing a new piece as we speak, so keep following!
Alain - you have to keep in mind the current social conversation, what people are saying, so when you write something like this you know to be explicit (not implicit) about what you mean by trans. Right now when the term Trans comes up in anything the first thought is transgender. Like many I assumed that's was what you were going to write about based on your title. This is not a criticism of your piece which I liked just a comment.
The mainstream press in the US and Europe has been an extension of the CIA for more than sixty. Don't look for them to expose anything.
Great Article Alain. Loved your documentary with Geert.
I'm happy Dr. Malone introduced you! I can't wait to read more of your clear and thought-provoking essays! I wish everyone had their eyes open!!
Totally agree with you. Unfortunately all this is happening under our eyes.
Bringing attention to this issue through articles like this help build awareness. However, unless they include links to options and empowering steps people can take to maintain their autonomy, and to block these plans, the articles only add to the fear porn.
There are always solutions. History shows people always rise up and overthrow tyranny when they have had enough. That time is already here. We have had enough, and we have pre-emptively had enough of these petty-minded tyrants.
Go to Global Walkout for some steps to get started.
Form local groups to barter, to support local growers, craftspeople and trades people.
Use cash, cash, cash.
Refuse to use self-serve checkouts, and generally avoid any business that is part of multi-nationals or is not interested in building win-win relationships with their clients.
Collect articles and data on cyber hacks and send these to your elected officials, stating you require them - as your representative - to uphold privacy laws, and to refuse the introduction of digital ID, and central digital currency.
Don't just send to them once - send to them often - phone them - post documents to them - and even organise email/letter/phone campaigns - to alert these public servants that the will of the people is to remain free and independent of govt enslavement.
Get pro-active about alerting people and building support to get govts to withdraw from WEF, UN, and any organisation or treaty that is calling the shots (pun) from the top - overruling democracy by lobbing govts to do their bidding.
These are just a few effective steps you can take.
The people have the true power, they just don't realise it. The govts - so obviously corrupt and colluding with each other AGAINST the people - want to keep us frightened, ignorant and battling each other - while they continue to strip us of sovereign rights that are NOT theirs to take.
"I do not consent" is one of the most powerful things you can think and say.
Get informed about your rights and how to protect them. Form study groups to help each other build knowledge and networks, and confidence with how to interact with officials who are breaching laws and rights. There are lawyers and human rights experts who can mentor you.
In Australia, we are starting to form People's Councils, throughout local regions. Once these are properly in place, we will formally overrule the current city councils, oust them from their offices, and take over running of the communities at ground level. This is happening. There are solutions.
Get clear.
Get connected.
Stay strong.
Get pro-active.
The most exciting thing about all this is to show each other - we DO value life, despite differences - and we CAN invest in everyone's thriving in ethical ways - without the bureaucrooks stealing our time, money, energy, and values.
Life is what we make it - so - make it beautiful!
Why is this titled "Transcommunism is coming" when there is nothing in teh post about trans communism unless your calling teh World Economic Forums efforts to implement a digital currency in place of existing money is Transcommunism.
I see Transcommunism as teh trans-activist flavor of collectivist governance in which the implementation of a trackable/controllable currency is just 1 piece of a larger system or plan.
Transcommunism = Transaction Communism.
Granted, he could have explained this and defined it at the beginning of the article, to provide clarity and avoid any lingering vagueness. But the entire article was about Communism being established through the Government gaining control over every individual's financial transactions; Communism which is activated and put in place by the government establishing Digital Currency, through which every purchase is monitored and approved or disapproved, every transaction monitored and recorded by the Government, and this government monitoring and control leading to a totalitarian dictatorship over every citizens life, and through which the government is notified and triggered to impose punishments and consequences for any disobedience a.k.a "failure to comply", as has already been seen in China, and most recently up in Canada during the Truckers COVID Protests...
It's what the entire article was about...
Transcommunism = Communism powered by the engine of Digital Currency whereby every financial transaction is controlled, monitored, approved or disapproved by an all-seeing, always watching Government that has eliminated all freedom, all personal choice, and assumed control over every aspect of ones life through the monitoring of all financial activity through the vehicle of Digital Currency technology that it has developed and put in place.
You'll notice he also didn't mention how the US Treasury and the Fed are currently making plans to establish Digital Currency here in the US, to totally replace the dollar and eliminate cash, as well, but it's been in the news, and Jerome Powell has been interviewed on 60 minutes admitting that they have been looking into how this can be done since Biden took office.
Biden is a major proponent of the WEF and helping China take control of the US, including putting a social credit scoring (ESG) system in place as a foundational step in accomplishing that, and has personally met with Klaus Schwab asking for his guidance and advice on how to implement the WEF's goals here in the US.
So what I missed is that Trans is transactional and not transgender. I'm so accustom to anything with "trans' in it being about teh transgender movement. Thank you for the clarity.
You bet... ;-)
This is the system that's described in Revelation, where the antichrist makes everyone of every social and economic class get a mark or implantation of some kind in their right hand or forehead, probably above the right eye, in order to participate in the economy. Without this mark, no one can buy or sell anything.
The majority will continue to deny this, call it conspiracy theory, even as they are getting the mark on their hand/forehead. I think some of what will kill this is that it won't be just the Right hand but either hand. Its possible the bible was altered over time or misinterpreted so that once we arrived this point the word of the "Right hand" will be defeat b/c they will do either hand.
Why is this considered a "suspicious link" when forwarded? Not good.
Back to the article. Could Tom Luongo be right, that JP Morgan, Wells, and Goldman will not go along with Davos on this, nor with digitizing the Fed? Could this save us? What would be Trump, or de Santis' positions on this? Shouldn't this be front and center going forward? The "free" vs "security state" freaks. What a battle, huh?
You'll have to ask your antivirus company or email provider for the answer to your first question....
As far as your next question, you'd have to point us to the article by Tom Luongo, otherwise we have no idea what he actually had to say on the subject, aside from what you generally summarized, and so we really couldn't give you an informed answer on that.
As far as Trump's or DeSantis's position on this, we couldn't tell you that either, as so far they haven't seemed to see the need to bring it up as an issue... you'd have to ask them.
Whether it should be front and center isn't really for us to say, as who is it that would be listening to us, exactly...? Probably a better question to ask Congress... providing you've got the time and resources...
No idea what you're referring to as far as "free" vs "security state" freaks either.... this scheme is being promoted by the control hungry globalists led by Klaus Schwab at the World Economic Forum, as the article states... it's about absolute totalitarian control... he wrote a whole book on it... as the article stated... you can find it online for free as a .pdf... it's called "The Great Reset".
...and there's not much of any battle going on, as no parties have been named that are fighting back... it's just a slow, steady progression forward, as those in positions of power and control who are connected with Schwab and the WEF keep making decisions that give them more power and control, and we lowly individuals really don't have any say in the matter at all as individuals who are not in positions of authority or control legislatively or politically....
Not entirely true. not every entity of sizeable power is necessarily "on board" with what Schwab's group is trying to do so much as go along with the over all plan so far because it's profitable. Once we get to those last few steps that will be very obvious as to what they are trying to do I believe we will see some of these entities who are currently cooperation, begin to resist. Why are they going along now but could resist later? Like many they still refuse to believe what Schwab's group wants to do, they think its conspiracy theory non-sense.
No idea what I mentioned that you're attempting to object to, honestly... nothing you've said seems to contradict anything that was stated in the comment above, or makes any kind of refutation against it... as far as what was stated, it seems to stand on it's own just fine...
I find it humorous that here you've said "nothing you've said seems to contradict anything that was stated in the comment above, or makes any kind of refutation against it" and in another go on to try and insult me claiming I need to improve my comprehension skills. So I need to remove the splinter from eye but you should also focus on the 2x4 in yours.
In both cases you seem to have shown reading comprehension problems....
In other words, in both cases, my responses pointed to the same thing, which apparently you still didn't understand....
No idea what you're talking about with splinters and 2x4's, since both responses basisally pointed out the same thing to you, and yet you still don't get it...
If I wanted to insult you, I'd say that was pretty humerous... but we both know it's nothing to be laughed about, but something you certainly have shown you need help with, or to work on if you care to...
So, I'll leave you to it, and wish you success in the future....
No, I listed those who are fighting back and it's hopefully the commercial banks through the Fed. They have the most to loose , and by extension us if we don't pay attention, and if we let goofballs like Biden, Yellen, WEF and Co guide us going forward. It doesn't have to be this way. Who wants to live in a 'Minority Report" world governed by "Eurotrash, commie, faggots"? Not my words, but an interesting term of endearment nonetheless given. The idea of returning to Federalism by regional Fed policy; that along with some long term bond couponed with gold makes a lot of sense and all through this lens of SOFR. Talk about fixing a problem.
But they're not "resisting"... they are going right along with it... In fact, there are articles about this that are readily found, such as "JPMorgan, Goldman face probe by 19 states over ESG investing" from October 2022... they're not resisiting it at all, they're attempting to capitalize on it, and buying into it... they are part of the problem... not any kind of solution to it...
Up to a point maybe. We're talking about the Fed not going along with it, and that includes the commercial banks. If they do what is being suggested, digital currencies, and then only one bank, that means no more commercial banking. Why would they go along with that?
Do not comply.
I agree that all of what you said is true and very concerning, however I fail to see how it's helpful or even relevant to use the trans flag to speak out against it. We must all be wary of simply finding another group of people to dehumanize...I know trans individuals who are authentic, freedom-minded, and spiritual, not at all connected to transhumanism. Let's not lose nuance as we build alliances with all who stand for sovereignty.
"I know trans individuals who are authentic, freedom-minded, and spiritual"
No such thing... You may pretend it.
Did you even read the article...? if you did, you obviously didn't understand it...
This has nothing to do with transsexuals... not one thing.
It has to do with Communism being brought in through Government control over Digital Currency Transactions.... Financial Transaction Communism... shortened to Transaction Communism... hence "Trans-Communism"...
We europeans clearly don't care much about any of the stuff They have been doing since March 2020...
Not even with all these terrorist sanctions against cheap and plentiful Energy do the herds of modern moron slaves in Europe start to see what the END GOAL is.
What a bunch...
In the text you write "Covid crisis" it seems obvious you forgot the word "planned"!
"Covid planned crisis"
And those weren't reactions but rather just the field test of the tools/measures they discussed during the previous years and specially during the last coordination meeting held in October 2019.
The WEF is just one gang of scoundrels and terrorists working and obeying the Orders of the Secular Ruling Families & Billionaires (at least those that matter!).
Very interesting article, I like the mix of trans and communism. Regarding the transgender movement I had another scenario https://marginals.substack.com/p/masten-vor-der-schlachtung
Not only did the article not mention anything about transgenders at all, but the article literally had nothing to do with transgenders even remotely.
The article was about Communism, hence "trans-communism", being brought in through Government control of Digital Financial Transactions. Digital Financial Transaction Communism, also known as Trans-Communism.
So why are so many thinning it's about transgenderism? Because that is what is currently associated wit teh term Trans so if you are going to use Trans and not in teh context of gender ideology then you're wise to explicitly state that at the begging of your piece.
I don't know about "so many" people taking the article out of context and thinking it was about transgenderism somehow, as your's was the only comment I saw that had misunderstood the article at the time I responded.
However, even if there are others who had also missed the context of the article and misunderstnading what it was actually about, that still doesn't change what it's actually about, which is control over people (Communism) being brougt in through our financial transactions with the new Digital Currency that they are trying to put in place. That is explicity what the author stated, and was writing about.
This really shouldn't be that hard to comprehend, especially after it was explained to you.... you should be able to go back over the article and see it with a fresh set of eyes, and a new understanding pretty easily after that, really... regardless of how many others may have misunderstood it, being fixated as they are on anything called "trans" automatically meaning "transgenderism" in their very limited understanding, and personal biases that cause them to have a knee-jerk reaction whenever they hear the term, just as you did, initially....
For them to do this only shows that they are shallow readers, with poor reading comprehension skills, and does not take anything away from what was written, or what was originally intended in the writing itself... it only means they are attempting to read material above their reading skill level.... and that's all it means.
However, the fact is, when one writes to an adult readership, one assumes the readers of the material are savvy enough to realize how a term is used from the context that it is used in, and that they don't need to have things that the vast majority of readers will readily understand explained to them, as if they are remedial readers who don't have the basic understanding that things must always be understood in context....
...and one presumes that the reader won't automatically take one term in isolation, out of context, fixate on that term, and disregard everything else that is being written, which makes no sense in relation to what they have taken that one term to mean (which obviously it won't), and will take the time to consider what they may have missed in their understanding for things to actually make sense... in this case that "trans" didn't refer to "transgenerism" at all, and so it must have been referring to something else... as the author indicated in his article.
One assumes their readers are not at such a poor reading level that without such basic explanations, they will take things out of context, totally misconstrue what was being spoken about, misunderstand the material, and go telling others that something was said or written about that never really was....
If you lack the ability to understand the context of what is being written about in general, that is an individual inadequacy in your reading skills, which others may also share, and it should be recognized as such, especially when someone has taken the time to explain what the actual context of the article was about for your personal benefit...
There is no need for the author to dumb down their writing for individuals who lack the ability to understand context, and as a result take things out of context and get the wrong idea from what is written, when the article is not actually written for that audience to begin with... it was written for those with the ability to understand it at the level it was written at... with the subject being explained, in this case, as being Communism brought in through Digital Financial Transactions...which the author did state, and spent the entire article elucidating on...
You were offered the kindness of having this explained to you... be gracious enough to accept the explanation, and don't carry on with blaming the author for your, or others, sub-standard reading comprehension skill level.... schools apparently don't put a priority on this anymore these days, unfortunately, so it's not surprising you're seeing others misunderstanding as well.... but it still doesn't change what the article was about, or the fact that you didn't pick up on it and needed some assistance in order to understand it and to see where you went' wrong...
Rather than blaming the author, or seeking to justify your original misunderstanding by saying others misunderstood too, so your misunderstanding must be okay, neither of which is an appriopriate response, it would serve you far better for you to learn from what was explained to you, and to take it with you going forward...
See if you can become a little more circumspect, and when something doesn't make sense to you when you're reading, consider that you may have simply misunderstood what was written, read it again to see what it was you might have missed, and accept when someone explains it to you when you can't, and move on...
It is not the authors problem having anything to do with his writing skill level, this is a reader comprehension skill problem, regardless of how many others may have the same low-level of reading comprehension skills these days... and you were provided with the information you were unable to grasp on your own... and that should have been the end of it...
You have an option here - either make it a goal to increase your reading skill level, or stop reading material that is above your level to comprehend.... it's reallly that simple...